There is widespread distaste of the
use of DVRs among broadcasting networks. You’d think they’d appreciate that
people can record the shows they broadcast and watch them in their own time,
but the distaste is for one reason: Consumers can now skip the commercials. Ted
Harbert, NBC’s chairman summed it up in a presentation to advertisers by
saying, “This is an insult to our joint investment in programming, and I’m
against it.”
Commercials have been around for
nearly as long as television has. Unlike radio, where the debate was whether or
not the radio waves should be privately or commercially funded, the only debate
around television was what the best way to generate advertising revenue was.
Soon enough, the commercial was born and became a mainstay in television. It soon
became the top medium for advertising and is still that way today (Pavlik,
346). In fact, 59.91% of advertising dollars spent are spent on advertising in
Cable TV, Network TV, and Local TV. An additional 4.84% is spent in Hispanic
and Syndicated TV. With figures like these, it’s easy to see why network
broadcasters wouldn’t like the idea of consumers being able to skip one of the
main sources of their revenue.
The advertisers are paying to
advertise to us, the consumers, and they’re paying quite a bit. With that, we
become the products the network broadcasters are offering them. However, with
the advent of DVRs, if more and more people can just skip the commercials, it
may get to the point where advertisers won’t want to waste their money to
advertise somewhere where their advertisement is just going to be skipped. They
may prefer to advertise somewhere where consumers can’t avoid seeing their
advertisement, such as an ad before or during a Hulu video, the ones that are
unable to be skipped if the consumer wants to see the show, or somewhere
similar.
However, I think that the amount of
people without DVR is still significant enough that there are still numerous
people who can’t just skip the commercials. Advertisers know this and as a
result, I don’t think that as of right now, DVR is cutting significantly into
revenue brought in by advertising money. But if DVR usage continues to increase
at a considerable rate, it might in the future. But, by then, technology might
advance and software might change to make DVR usage more like Hulu, where you
can’t watch the entire show without seeing a few commercials. It’s hard to tell
if it could cut into the revenue in the future simply because of how rapidly
technology changes.
Sources:
Pavlik, John. Converging Media. 3rd Ed. New York:
Oxford University Press, 2011. eBook.
No comments:
Post a Comment